Matthew 24:34 and the Truth of Christianity

Abstract

This document examines Matthew 24:34 —“Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened”— a verse frequently cited as evidence that Jesus made a failed prediction about the end of the world. Critics argue the prophecy did not come true within the lifetime of Jesus’ hearers, thereby undermining his credibility and the reliability of Scripture. This study demonstrates that the statement was in fact remarkably accurate when understood in its historical, literary, and prophetic context: it was fulfilled primarily in the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in AD 70. The discourse as a whole carefully distinguishes between events that would occur within “this generation” and events that remain future. The analysis draws on early Christian testimony, modern scholarship, linguistic evidence, and the foundational role of Daniel.

Section 1: Introductory Matters: The Controversy Over Jesus’ Prophetic Credibility

C.S. Lewis described Matthew 24:34 as “the most embarrassing verse in the Bible”:

“It is clear from the New Testament that [Jesus] believed the end of the world was coming in the lifetime of some of his hearers. ‘This generation shall not pass away till all be fulfilled’ (Matthew 24:34) is the most embarrassing verse in the Bible.” (Lewis, 1960, The World’s Last Night)

This interpretation has been echoed by prominent critics:

• Bart D. Ehrman (1999) — Jesus as a failed apocalyptic prophet

• Albert Schweitzer (1906) — expectation of imminent end that did not materialize

• Bertrand Russell (1927) — evidence against Jesus’ omniscience and divinity

• Gerald Sigal (Jews for Judaism) — unfulfilled promise disproving messianic claims

The logic is direct: if Jesus predicted the end of the age within that generation and it did not happen, then his prophetic authority is compromised.

However, early Christian writers—living much closer to the events—regarded the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70 as spectacular confirmation of Jesus’ words.

Defenses from the Early Church Fathers

Several early apologists explicitly cited the Temple’s destruction as fulfilled prophecy:

• Tertullian (Apology, c. 197 AD): “He predicted that not one stone would be left upon another… fulfilled when Vespasian and Titus subdued Judea.”

• Origen (Against Celsus, c. 248 AD): “The prophecy… was accomplished within the lifetime of those who heard Him.”

• Eusebius (Ecclesiastical History 3.7.1–2): “All these things were fulfilled according to the prophecy… during the campaign of Titus and Vespasian.”

• Justin Martyr (Dialogue with Trypho, c. 100–165 AD): “Your Temple has been destroyed, as He foretold… showing that He spoke with divine authority.”

These testimonies, supported by Josephus (Jewish War), show that the Church Fathers considered the destruction of the Jewish Temple in AD 70 as visible, historical evidence of Jesus’ foreknowledge.

The Importance of the Book of Daniel to the Olivet Discourse

The Olivet Discourse is built on Daniel’s prophecies, especially:

• the seventy weeks (Dan 9:24–27)

• the abomination of desolation (9:27; 11:31; 12:11)

• the Son of Man coming on clouds (7:13–14)

The seventy weeks (490 years) begin with Artaxerxes’ 457 BC decree (Ezra 7:12–26):

• 7 weeks (49 years): Jerusalem rebuilt

• 62 weeks (434 years): lead to Messiah’s public appearance (~AD 27)

• 1 final week (7 years): Messiah “cut off” (~AD 30–33), new covenant confirmed; period concludes ~AD 34 (Acts 8:1–2).

Daniel 9:24 lists six messianic objectives fulfilled in Christ:

1. Finish transgression

   Christ’s obedience and death decisively dealt with human rebellion (Isa 53:5–6, 11–12). The new covenant writes God’s law on hearts and remembers sins no more (Heb 8:6 13).

2. Make an end of sins

3. Jesus’ atoning death broke sin’s power and provided final forgiveness. Through faith in his blood, God justifies believers, ending sin’s condemnation (Rom 3:21–26; Isa 53:4 6, 12).

4. Make reconciliation for iniquity

   The Suffering Servant was pierced for our transgressions and offered as a guilt offering (Isa 53:5–10). Jesus is the atoning sacrifice (propitiation) reconciling us to God (Rom 3:25).

5. Bring in everlasting righteousness

   God’s righteousness is revealed and imputed to believers through faith in Christ, providing eternal standing before God (Rom 3:21–22; cf. Heb 8–10).

6. Seal up vision and prophecy

   Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection fulfilled and authenticated Old Testament prophecy. His prediction and fulfillment of raising “this temple” (his body) in three days confirmed his messianic role (John 2:19–21).

7. Anoint the Most Holy Christ,

   anointed by the Spirit and exalted as high priest, entered the heavenly sanctuary “once for all” with his own blood, securing eternal redemption. He himself is the true holy place (Heb 8:1–2; 9:11–12; John 2:19–21).

The aftermath of the seventy weeks (Dan 9:26–27) extends to the Roman destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in AD 70. Jesus directly applies the “abomination of desolation” to this event (Matt 24:15).

Linguistic and Literary Topics

Meaning of “Generation” (γενεά)

In Koine Greek, γενεά most naturally refers to a contemporary group of people (roughly 25–40 years). When paired with the near-demonstrative οὗτος (“this”), it consistently points to the audience’s own generation (Matt 11:16; 12:41–42; 23:36; 24:34). No Koine examples exist of γενεὰ + οὗτος referring to a distant future group. The proximal demonstrative "this" (οὗτος) naturally points to something present or near, making a reference to a distant future group linguistically unlikely and unattested. [For details defending this view see my study “Meaning of Generation in Koine (pdf)”]

Discourse Markers in Matthew

Matthew employs several Greek discourse markers to guide the reader:

• γάρ (“for”) — explanatory, supportive Clusters (especially vv. 5–7) provide reasons and details under the main warning (“See that no one leads you astray”).

• δέ — developmental, mild transition Frequently links related signs and events in vv. 4–14 and throughout the early part of the discourse.

• περί δέ (“but concerning…”) — major topic shift marker The decisive structural pivot occurs at Matthew 24:36: Περὶ δὲ τῆς ἡµέρας ἐκείνης καὶ τῆς ὥρας οὐδεὶς οἶδεν… “But concerning that day and hour no one knows…” In Koine Greek, περί + δέ is a standard way to introduce a new topic or shift focus to a different (often higher-level or contrasting) subject. It functions almost like a section heading: “Now, as for the matter of…”

• Everything before 24:36 (vv. 4–35) is characterized by:

  • observable signs

  • warnings to flee

  • assurance that “this generation will not pass away” until the events occur

• Everything after 24:36 (vv. 36–51 and all of chapter 25) is characterized by:

  • ignorance of the exact time

  • suddenness

  • possibility of long delay

  • repeated calls to constant readiness

• περί δέ therefore marks the clear division between:

  • the near-term events (primarily AD 66–70: abomination, tribulation, Temple destruction)

  • the ultimate parousia (final, personal return of Christ, whose day and hour remain unknown)

• This structural break is reinforced by the inclusios (below) and the thematic shift from “you will see” to “no one knows.”

The Role of Inclusio in Matthew’s Gospel, with Special Attention to the Olivet Discourse

Inclusio (also known as bracketing or envelope structure) is a common literary device in ancient Greek and Hebrew literature. It places a repeated word, phrase, motif, or theme at the beginning and end of a section to mark its boundaries and to highlight its central idea. Examples appear in Homeric epic, Greek historiography (Herodotus, Thucydides), the Septuagint, and New Testament writings.

Below are the primary examples of inclusio in Matthew. (R.T. France , The Gospel of Matthew, NICNT 2007).

1. The Whole Gospel is structured as an inclusio. “God with us” (Immanuel) in 1:23 is matched by Jesus’ final promise, “I am with you always, to the end of the age” (28:20). This frames the entire book with the theme of divine presence in the new covenant community.

2. Identical summaries frame the Galilean Ministry in Matthew 4:23 and 9:35 (“teaching… proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom… healing every disease”). This inclusio encloses chapters 5–9, pairing the Sermon on the Mount (teaching) with the miracle narratives (deeds).

3. The heavenly voice at the baptism (3:17: “This is my beloved Son…”) is repeated, with the added command “Listen to him,” at the transfiguration (17:5), bracketing Jesus’ public ministry. The added command “listen to him” at the Transfiguration signaling a pivot toward the passion predictions that follow.

4. Matthew 23:36 (“Truly I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation”) is echoed almost verbatim in 24:34 (“Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place”). This is a deliberate inclusio that brackets the woes against the religious leaders (ch. 23) and the predictions of temple destruction and associated events (24:1–35). The device stresses that the judgment described falls on Jesus’ own contemporaries (fulfilled in AD 70).

   
   

5. By employing inclusio selectively and cautiously, Matthew produces a tightly woven, theologically rich narrative that invites readers to respond faithfully to the ever-present Jesus. The deliberate use of inclusio to frame the judgement theme of the Jewish leaders is particularly important to our defense of Jesus’ authority. Together with the περί δέ shift at v. 36, these inclusios make it unmistakable that Matthew has organized the discourse to distinguish first century events from the final parousia.

Section 2: Commentary (with brief comments on the controversy)

Matthew 24:1–2 — Prediction of Temple Destruction

Jesus leaves the Temple; disciples admire its buildings. He responds: “Not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.”

This prediction was literally fulfilled in AD 70 when Titus’ army burned the Temple and soldiers dismantled it stone by stone to recover melted gold (Josephus, Jewish War 6.4–6; 6.5.2).

This is the clearest part of the prophecy that everyone agrees was fulfilled within the generation — undermining the claim that the entire discourse failed.

Matthew 24:3 — Disciples’ Questions

Privately on the Mount of Olives, the disciples ask two (or three) interrelated questions:

Question 1) When will these things (Temple destruction) happen?

Question 2) What will be the sign of your coming (parousia)

and 3)? …and of the end of the age?

The critics of Jesus (discussed earlier) have assumed that the disciples asked only one question. However, the structure of Matthew, though discourse markers, clearly distinguishes between near-term events and the ultimate future horizon.

Matthew 24:4–14 — The Beginning of Birth Pains

Jesus warns against deception and lists preliminary signs:

• false messiahs claiming “I am the Christ”

• wars and rumors of wars

• famines and earthquakes in various places

Events such as these are all well documented throughout the 1st century AD; however, they are “the beginning of birth pains” (v. 8), not the immediate end.Jesus adds that believers will face hatred, betrayal, and persecution, but “the one who stands firm to the end will be saved” (v. 13). The gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations (τῇ οἰκουµένῃ, the inhabited world)—a statement Paul later says had already occurred by the time he wrote Colossians (Col 1:6,23; Rom 1:8).

These signs were already beginning in the first century and are not presented as proof that the end was immediately imminent.

Matthew 24:15–28 — The Abomination of Desolation and Great Tribulation

Jesus gives the clearest sign of imminent catastrophe:

“So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand—then let those in Judea flee to the mountains.” (vv. 15–16). Luke clarifies for Gentile readers: “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near” (Luke 21:20).

Historical fulfillment (AD 70):

• In late 66 AD, shortly after the outbreak of the First Jewish–Roman War (the Great Jewish Revolt), Cestius Gallus marched south from Syria into Judea and effectively laid siege to the city for several days. For unknown reasons, the siege was unexpectedly lifted. Christians in Jerusalem, remembering Jesus’ word fled Jerusalem for Pella (Eusebius, Eccl. Hist. 3.5.3–4).

• The Roman legions returned first under Vespasian (67-69 AD) and finally Titus who successfully conquered Jerusalem in 70 AD.

• Roman eagle standards were raised in the Temple courts — a profound act of desecration (Josephus, Jewish War 6.6.1).

• The Temple was ultimately burned and systematically dismantled.

This is the central event Jesus said would occur within “this generation” — a clear, verifiable fulfillment that answers the main criticism.

Matthew 24:29–31 — Cosmic Signs and the Coming of the Son of Man

1. The Cosmic Disturbance (v. 29) – Prophetic Judgment Language

The dramatic description of heavenly bodies failing is not a prediction of literal astronomical catastrophe (e.g., the sun physically going out or stars literally falling to Earth). Instead, this is well-established Old Testament prophetic idiom used to describe the collapse of a political religious world order or the judgment of a nation/empire.

Key Old Testament parallels:

• Isaiah 13:9–10 (against Babylon): “Behold, the day of the LORD comes, cruel, with wrath and fierce anger… For the stars of the heavens and their constellations will not give their light; the sun will be dark at its rising, and the moon will not shed its light.”
  

• Isaiah 34:4 (against Edom): “All the host of heaven shall rot away, and the skies roll up like a scroll. All their host shall fall, as leaves fall from the vine, like leaves falling from the fig tree.”
  

• Ezekiel 32:7–8 (against Pharaoh/Egypt): “When I blot you out, I will cover the heavens and make their stars dark; I will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon shall not give its light. All the bright lights of heaven will I make dark over you…”
  

• Joel 2:10, 30–31 (day of the Lord / locust army as divine judgment): “The sun and the moon are darkened, and the stars withdraw their shining… The sun shall be turned to darkness, and the moon to blood, before the great and awesome day of the LORD comes.”

These cosmic signs accompany judgment on Judah (near-term) and foreshadow final judgment. Peter applies part of this to Pentecost (Acts 2:16–21), showing the language is typological and multi-layered, not a literal prediction of astronomical events.

• Amos 8:9 (judgment on Israel): “And on that day, declares the Lord GOD, I will make the sun go down at noon and darken the earth in broad daylight.”

The flood in Genesis 6–9 is the only event in the entire biblical record that actually enacts a literal, near-total de-creation of the ordered world: the reversal of the separation of waters, land submerged, living creatures destroyed, the earth returned to a state of chaos and emptiness 9 (echoing Gen 1:2). Since that event, nothing comparable has ever occurred in recorded history.

All the passages listed use highly figurative, hyperbolic cosmic language to describe God’s decisive judgment on specific nations or peoples within history. They deliberately borrow the imagery of creation being undone to convey the severity and finality of the judgment, but they do not describe a literal de-creation of the physical universe.

But since the flood itself, God has never again reversed the created order on a global scale. These passages are not predictions of literal cosmic de-creation. They are poetic declarations that the judgment about to fall will be so overwhelming that it will feel — to the people experiencing it — as if the very foundations of the world are collapsing.

Application in Matthew 24

Jesus uses this same symbolic language to describe the cosmic significance of the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in AD 70. The fall of the Temple = the collapse of the old covenant world order. The “heavenly powers being shaken” symbolizes the removal of the old religious authorities and system that rejected the Messiah.

This de-creation imagery in Matthew looks forward to the time when God judges Jerusalem, it is as though the creation itself mourns and collapses — a literary way of expressing that the old world is ending and a new order is dawning. Though not recognized by secular historians, the destruction of Jerusalem was a singularly pivotal event in history.

2. “The Son of Man coming on the clouds” (v. 30) – Daniel 7 enthronement scene

Direct quotation

The phrase “the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory” is almost verbatim from Daniel 7:13 –14

Key interpretive points

• In Daniel 7, the Son of Man does not descend to Earth to end history. Rather, the Son of Man’s “coming with the clouds” (Dan 7:13–14) is an ascent to God (the Ancient of Days) for enthronement and receipt of an everlasting kingdom, fulfilled in Jesus’ ascension (Acts 1:9–11) and vindication through the AD 70 judgment on Jerusalem (seen as divine judgment on apostate Israel). This is not the parousia (second coming) but Christ’s heavenly investiture, inaugurating his rule through the church (the “saints” receiving the kingdom, Dan 7:18, 27).

• The “coming on the clouds” is therefore a vindication scene — the Son of Man is exalted to the right hand of God and receives the kingdom. Jesus applies this exact scene to the 10 aftermath of the AD 70 tribulation. The destruction of the Temple becomes the public, historical demonstration that Jesus is indeed the exalted Son of Man who now reigns.

Supporting texts where Jesus uses the same imagery

• At his trial: “From now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven.” (Matt 26:64) → Jesus tells the Sanhedrin they would witness (in their generation) the beginning of this exaltation.

• Stephen’s vision: “Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.” (Acts 7:56) — shortly before the persecution that leads to the gospel going to the Gentiles.

Critics’ mistake

Those who read Matt 24:30 as a prediction of a literal, visible second coming in the first century miss two things:

• the symbolic nature of Old Testament judgment language (de-creation motif), and

• the specific direction of Daniel 7 (ascent to receive kingdom, not descent to end the world).

In AD 70, the Temple’s fall was the visible sign that the old order was overthrown and Jesus’ kingdom authority was being publicly vindicated.

3. Gathering of the Elect from the Four Winds (v. 31) Matthew 24:31:

“And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.”

Old Testament background

• Deuteronomy 30:3–4: God will “gather you again from all the peoples where the LORD your God has scattered you… from the four winds.”
  

• Isaiah 27:13: “And in that day a great trumpet will be blown, and those who were lost in the land of Assyria and those who were driven out to the land of Egypt will come and worship the LORD…”
  

• Isaiah 11:12: God “will assemble the banished of Israel, and gather the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.”
  

• Zechariah 2:6: “Up! Up! Flee from the land of the north… for I have spread you abroad as the four winds of the heavens, declares the LORD.”

Application in Matthew 24

After the judgment on Jerusalem (AD 70), the gospel explodes outward. The “gathering of the elect” is not primarily a rapture event in this context, but the ingathering of believers from every nation into the kingdom — the fulfillment of the Abrahamic promise that all nations would be blessed (Gen 12:3; 22:18).

This matches the historical reality: after AD 70, Christianity rapidly spreads beyond Judea into the Gentile world, exactly as Jesus predicted earlier: “this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world (τῇ οἰκουµένῃ—the inhabited world) as a testimony to all nations” (Matt 24:14).

Summary of Matthew 24:29–31

• v. 29 → symbolic collapse of the old covenant world order (OT judgment idiom)

• v. 30 → vindication / enthronement of Jesus as the Son of Man (Dan 7:13–14)

• v. 31 → worldwide expansion of the kingdom / gathering of the elect from all nations
  

When read against Daniel and the OT prophetic tradition, this passage describes the historical transition from the old covenant to the new covenant era — a transition dramatically marked by the events of AD 70 — rather than a literal cosmic end in the first century.

Critics who insist on a strictly literal, visible second coming in the first century overlook both the symbolic genre of apocalyptic language and the specific direction of Daniel 7 (enthronement/ vindication, not descent to end history).

Matthew 24:32–35 — Fig Tree and This Generation

Jesus uses the fig tree parable: when branches become tender and leaves appear, summer is near. Likewise, when the disciples see “all these things,” they know the event is near—even at the door (vv. 32–33). (see previous discussion of this inclusio)

The solemn declaration follows:

“Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.” (v. 34)

“All these things” refers to the events described in vv. 4–31. “This generation” points to the contemporaries of Jesus and the disciples — the generation that lived from ~AD 30 to ~AD 70. 12 This is the verse at the heart of the controversy. When “all these things” is read as the events Jesus just described (especially the abomination and Temple destruction), the statement is historically accurate. ]

Matthew 24:36–51 — The Unknown Day and Faithful Stewardship

A major structural shift occurs with περί δέ:

“But concerning (περί δέ) that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.” (v. 36)

From this point forward, the focus changes to the final parousia. Jesus compares it to the days of Noah (sudden, unexpected), to a thief, and to a master returning at an unpredictable time. The faithful servant is rewarded; the wicked servant is punished severely.

The shift here is deliberate: the near-term events have signs; the ultimate return does not.

Matthew 25:1–13 — Parable of the Ten Virgins

The kingdom of heaven is like ten virgins waiting for the bridegroom. Five were wise (prepared extra oil); five were foolish (unprepared). The bridegroom’s delay tests readiness. When he arrives at midnight, only the prepared enter the wedding banquet.

Key lesson: “Therefore keep watch, because you do not know the day or the hour” (v. 13).

Matthew 25:14–30 — Parable of the Talents

A man going on a journey entrusts his property to three servants according to their ability. Two invest and double their talents; one buries his out of fear. The master returns, commends the faithful, and severely judges the unfaithful servant, casting him into outer darkness.

Lesson: faithful stewardship during the master’s absence is required.

Matthew 25:31–46 — The Sheep and the Goats (Judgment of the Nations)

When the Son of Man comes in glory with all the angels, he sits on his glorious throne. All nations are gathered before him. He separates people as a shepherd separates sheep from goats:

• The righteous (“sheep”) inherit the kingdom because they showed mercy to “the least of these my brothers and sisters.”

• The unrighteous (“goats”) go to eternal punishment for neglecting the same.

This final scene depicts the ultimate, universal judgment — the great horizon that lies beyond the events of “this generation.”

Conclusion

Matthew 24:34 is not a failed prediction. It is a historically precise prophecy of the AD 70 judgment on Jerusalem and the Temple. The discourse’s careful structure—especially the περί δέ topic shift at v. 36 and the inclusio—clearly distinguishes first-century events from the future parousia. Far from being an embarrassment, the passage strengthens the credibility of Jesus and the reliability of Scripture.

References

• Beasley-Murray, G. R. (1986). Jesus and the Kingdom of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

• Blomberg, C. L. (1992). Matthew (The New American Commentary, Vol. 22). Nashville, TN: Broadman Press.

• Carson, D. A. (1984). Matthew. In F. E. Gaebelein (Ed.), The Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Vol. 8, pp. 3-599). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

• Davies, W.D., and Dale C. Allison Jr. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. 3 volumes. International Critical Commentary (ICC). Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988 (Vol. 1: Introduction and Commentary on Matthew 1–7), 1991 (Vol. 2: Commentary on Matthew 8–18), 1997 (Vol. 3: Commentary on Matthew 19–28).

• Bart D. Ehrman (1999) Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium. Oxford University Press. Eusebius (trans. Lake, 1926)

• France, R.T. The Gospel of Matthew. New International Commentary on the New Testament (NICNT). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007.

• Hagner, Donald A. Matthew 1–13. Word Biblical Commentary (WBC) 33A. Dallas: Word Books, 1993.

• Hagner, Donald A. Matthew 14–28. Word Biblical Commentary (WBC) 33B. Dallas/ Thomas Nelson, 1995.

• Josephus. The Jewish War. Translated by William Whiston. Revised by Paul L. Maier. In The New Complete Works of Josephus, 667–1080. Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1999.

• Keener, C. S. (2009). The Gospel of Matthew: A socio-rhetorical commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

• Lewis, C.S. (1960), The World’s Last Night 14

• Morris, L. (1992). The Gospel according to Matthew (The Pillar New Testament Commentary). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

• Nolland, John. The Gospel of Matthew: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary (NIGTC). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans; Bletchley: Paternoster, 2005.

• Origen. Against Celsus. In The Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4, edited by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, translated by Frederick Crombie. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1885. [or online at https://ccel.org]

• Russell, Bertrand. (1957). Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects. Edited by Paul Edwards. New York: Simon and Schuster.

• Schweitzer, Albert. 2001. The Quest of the Historical Jesus. Edited by John Bowden. Translated by W. Montgomery et al. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

• Sigal, Gerald. The Jew and the Christian Missionary: A Jewish Response to Missionary Christianity. New York: Ktav Publishing House, 1981.

• Sproul, R. C. (1998). The Last Days According to Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

• Tertullian. (1934). Apology. In Loeb Classical Library (Vol. 250, pp. 3–223). Harvard University Press. (Original work published ca. 197 CE; translated by T. R. Glover)

• Walvoord, J. F. (1974). Matthew: Thy Kingdom Come. Chicago, IL: Moody Press.

• Wright, N. T. (1996). Jesus and the Victory of God (Christian Origins and the Question of God, Vol. 2). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.